<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 382 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374755</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, providing the appellant with an opportunity to submit a proper reply to the show cause notice. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the maintenance of accounts on an accrual basis and the inability to substantiate foreign currency expenditure due to factory lockout was considered valid. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 382 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374755</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, providing the appellant with an opportunity to submit a proper reply to the show cause notice. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the maintenance of accounts on an accrual basis and the inability to substantiate foreign currency expenditure due to factory lockout was considered valid. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>