https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374749 The Supreme Court upheld the termination of the appellant's services, ruling that she did not meet the eligibility criteria of having five years of post-qualification experience as a Company Secretary as required by the advertisement. The Court interpreted "experience as a Company Secretary" to mean formal appointment and functioning in that role, not just performing similar duties in other capacities. Despite the appellant's argument that her experience should be considered, the Court held that her roles as Management Trainee and Assistant Company Secretary did not meet the specific criterion set out in the advertisement. en-us Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374749 The Supreme Court upheld the termination of the appellant's services, ruling that she did not meet the eligibility criteria of having five years of post-qualification experience as a Company Secretary as required by the advertisement. The Court interpreted "experience as a Company Secretary" to mean formal appointment and functioning in that role, not just performing similar duties in other capacities. Despite the appellant's argument that her experience should be considered, the Court held that her roles as Management Trainee and Assistant Company Secretary did not meet the specific criterion set out in the advertisement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374749