https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278503 A writ challenge to the West Bengal Clinical Establishments (Registration, Regulation and Transparency) Act, 2017 was held maintainable because the pleadings assailed the impugned provisions, disclosed a constitutional cause of action, and imperfect drafting of prayers did not prevent the Court from moulding relief. The provisions were then upheld as valid regulatory measures: the Court accepted the classification between different kinds of clinical establishments, including single-doctor consultation clinics where treatment is rendered, and held that requirements on emergency care, billing, grievance redressal, records, transparency, and compensation were reasonable public-interest regulation. No repugnancy, manifest arbitrariness, or unconstitutional interference with the right to practise was found. en-us Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:18:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278503 A writ challenge to the West Bengal Clinical Establishments (Registration, Regulation and Transparency) Act, 2017 was held maintainable because the pleadings assailed the impugned provisions, disclosed a constitutional cause of action, and imperfect drafting of prayers did not prevent the Court from moulding relief. The provisions were then upheld as valid regulatory measures: the Court accepted the classification between different kinds of clinical establishments, including single-doctor consultation clinics where treatment is rendered, and held that requirements on emergency care, billing, grievance redressal, records, transparency, and compensation were reasonable public-interest regulation. No repugnancy, manifest arbitrariness, or unconstitutional interference with the right to practise was found. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278503