<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 372 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for AY 2009-10, as the quantum additions leading to the penalty imposition were previously annulled by a separate Tribunal order. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was dismissed due to the lack of new evidence challenging the Tribunal&#039;s ruling. Despite attempts to justify the penalty imposition, the Tribunal emphasized the uncontroverted fact of the annulled quantum addition, leading to the maintenance of the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 372 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for AY 2009-10, as the quantum additions leading to the penalty imposition were previously annulled by a separate Tribunal order. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was dismissed due to the lack of new evidence challenging the Tribunal&#039;s ruling. Despite attempts to justify the penalty imposition, the Tribunal emphasized the uncontroverted fact of the annulled quantum addition, leading to the maintenance of the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>