<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 358 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for AY 2009-10 and 2010-11. It confirmed the addition of 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases but upheld the disallowance of donation and rent expenses. However, it allowed minor expenses supported by self-made vouchers, emphasizing fair income estimation and the requirement for evidence to support expense claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 358 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for AY 2009-10 and 2010-11. It confirmed the addition of 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases but upheld the disallowance of donation and rent expenses. However, it allowed minor expenses supported by self-made vouchers, emphasizing fair income estimation and the requirement for evidence to support expense claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>