<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 349 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the assessee, upholding lower authorities&#039; decisions on disallowance of agricultural income and additions of undisclosed income from property transactions. The disallowance of agricultural income was partially allowed for some years but confirmed for one assessment year. The undisclosed income from property purchases and property agreement was upheld due to lack of evidence and explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 06:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 349 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the assessee, upholding lower authorities&#039; decisions on disallowance of agricultural income and additions of undisclosed income from property transactions. The disallowance of agricultural income was partially allowed for some years but confirmed for one assessment year. The undisclosed income from property purchases and property agreement was upheld due to lack of evidence and explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>