<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 347 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374720</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the capital gain tax should be assessed at the level of the Hindu Undivided Family to which the property belonged, rather than on the individual coparceners. The judgment emphasized the distinction between ownership under common law and tax law, ultimately overturning the previous tax assessments and deleting the capital gain tax assessment on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 347 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374720</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the capital gain tax should be assessed at the level of the Hindu Undivided Family to which the property belonged, rather than on the individual coparceners. The judgment emphasized the distinction between ownership under common law and tax law, ultimately overturning the previous tax assessments and deleting the capital gain tax assessment on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>