<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 342 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374715</link>
    <description>Sale proceeds from export sugar quota or an export licence cannot be treated as assessable value for Business Auxiliary Service where the transaction is only a sale of rights and privileges. That activity is characterised as sale of goods, not provision of a taxable service. The issue was treated as settled by earlier binding Tribunal authority, consistent with Supreme Court rulings relied on there. On that basis, the service tax demand and penalty were held not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 06:29:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 342 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374715</link>
      <description>Sale proceeds from export sugar quota or an export licence cannot be treated as assessable value for Business Auxiliary Service where the transaction is only a sale of rights and privileges. That activity is characterised as sale of goods, not provision of a taxable service. The issue was treated as settled by earlier binding Tribunal authority, consistent with Supreme Court rulings relied on there. On that basis, the service tax demand and penalty were held not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>