<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 341 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374714</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of maintaining separate accounts for verification, setting aside the order. The demand related to availing credit based on invoices from another entity was upheld, but the penalty was annulled. The Tribunal clarified that job workers cannot avail credit based on ISD invoices, aligning with previous decisions. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 06:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 341 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374714</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of maintaining separate accounts for verification, setting aside the order. The demand related to availing credit based on invoices from another entity was upheld, but the penalty was annulled. The Tribunal clarified that job workers cannot avail credit based on ISD invoices, aligning with previous decisions. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>