<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 339 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374712</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal rejected the applications for rectification of mistakes in final orders A/92338/2017 and A/92328/2017, focusing on the wrong availment of CENVAT credit by the applicants. The plea of limitation was deemed irrelevant as the applicants were found ineligible for the credit due to insufficient details in the invoices. The Tribunal held that allowing the utilization of such credit would be improper, leading to the dismissal of the rectification applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 06:29:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 339 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374712</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal rejected the applications for rectification of mistakes in final orders A/92338/2017 and A/92328/2017, focusing on the wrong availment of CENVAT credit by the applicants. The plea of limitation was deemed irrelevant as the applicants were found ineligible for the credit due to insufficient details in the invoices. The Tribunal held that allowing the utilization of such credit would be improper, leading to the dismissal of the rectification applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>