<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16688</link>
    <description>A claim for informer reward under a confidential departmental scheme was treated as dependent on the quality of information, the assistance rendered, the risk and trouble undertaken, and the department&#039;s administrative assessment. The arrangement was not regarded as an absolute entitlement enforceable as of right, and the Court held that no writ remedy would lie to compel payment in the absence of a clear legal right. The informer&#039;s role did not create a fundamental right to reward, and the challenge to non-payment failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:57:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16688</link>
      <description>A claim for informer reward under a confidential departmental scheme was treated as dependent on the quality of information, the assistance rendered, the risk and trouble undertaken, and the department&#039;s administrative assessment. The arrangement was not regarded as an absolute entitlement enforceable as of right, and the Court held that no writ remedy would lie to compel payment in the absence of a clear legal right. The informer&#039;s role did not create a fundamental right to reward, and the challenge to non-payment failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>