<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 326 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374699</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of linking Aadhar with PAN for filing Income Tax Returns, making it mandatory as per section 139AA of the Income Tax Act. Respondents who filed returns without this linkage for the previous year per High Court&#039;s order must now comply with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision for the upcoming Assessment Year 2019-20. The Court clarified the necessity of adhering to the mandatory linkage, disposing of pending applications and providing clear guidance on compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 13:34:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 326 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374699</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of linking Aadhar with PAN for filing Income Tax Returns, making it mandatory as per section 139AA of the Income Tax Act. Respondents who filed returns without this linkage for the previous year per High Court&#039;s order must now comply with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision for the upcoming Assessment Year 2019-20. The Court clarified the necessity of adhering to the mandatory linkage, disposing of pending applications and providing clear guidance on compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>