https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374690 The NCLAT remitted the case back to the NCLT for re-hearing, allowing the appellants to amend their petition and provide evidence of the company's operational status and reasons for restoring its name. The NCLT was directed to allow the submission of additional documents and conduct a fresh hearing for both parties. The matter was restored to the NCLT's file, with parties required to appear before the NCLT on 8th January 2019. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374690 The NCLAT remitted the case back to the NCLT for re-hearing, allowing the appellants to amend their petition and provide evidence of the company's operational status and reasons for restoring its name. The NCLT was directed to allow the submission of additional documents and conduct a fresh hearing for both parties. The matter was restored to the NCLT's file, with parties required to appear before the NCLT on 8th January 2019. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374690