<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 309 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374682</link>
    <description>The Tribunal treated the dispute on CENVAT credit for outdoor catering service as covered by the Larger Bench ruling in M/s. Wipro Ltd. v. CCE, Bangalore. As the central controversy had already been adjudicated, the pending miscellaneous applications for rectification of the interim order were allowed so the appeals could proceed to final hearing. The Tribunal accordingly directed that the appeals be listed for final hearing on 18 January 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 13:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 309 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374682</link>
      <description>The Tribunal treated the dispute on CENVAT credit for outdoor catering service as covered by the Larger Bench ruling in M/s. Wipro Ltd. v. CCE, Bangalore. As the central controversy had already been adjudicated, the pending miscellaneous applications for rectification of the interim order were allowed so the appeals could proceed to final hearing. The Tribunal accordingly directed that the appeals be listed for final hearing on 18 January 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>