<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16678</link>
    <description>The court held that the accrued interest of Rs. 26,538 was not assessable as income in the hands of the assessee due to a compromise that involved forgoing both interest and capital. Additionally, the court allowed the deduction of Rs. 23,850 as expenses related to earning the interest income. The court ruled against the Department on the assessability of the interest income and in favor of the assessee on the deductibility of expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:29:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16678</link>
      <description>The court held that the accrued interest of Rs. 26,538 was not assessable as income in the hands of the assessee due to a compromise that involved forgoing both interest and capital. Additionally, the court allowed the deduction of Rs. 23,850 as expenses related to earning the interest income. The court ruled against the Department on the assessability of the interest income and in favor of the assessee on the deductibility of expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>