https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278487 The tribunal dismissed the appeal against the confirmation of a demand under rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, along with interest charges and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai. The dispute involved the availment of CENVAT credit on services for two distinct periods, with the appellant failing to provide sufficient evidence linking the services to the manufacturing process. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of clear and substantiated evidence to support claims for availing CENVAT credit in manufacturing activities. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:34:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278487 The tribunal dismissed the appeal against the confirmation of a demand under rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, along with interest charges and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai. The dispute involved the availment of CENVAT credit on services for two distinct periods, with the appellant failing to provide sufficient evidence linking the services to the manufacturing process. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of clear and substantiated evidence to support claims for availing CENVAT credit in manufacturing activities. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278487