<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1506 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278488</link>
    <description>Imported external hard disc drives were treated as classifiable under CTH 84717020, because earlier decisions on the same controversy had already settled that classification. Applying that existing view, the notification benefit under Notification No. 12/2012-CE dated 01.03.2012 was available on the same footing. The departmental challenge was therefore not accepted, and the classification and exemption granted by the lower appellate authority were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:34:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1506 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278488</link>
      <description>Imported external hard disc drives were treated as classifiable under CTH 84717020, because earlier decisions on the same controversy had already settled that classification. Applying that existing view, the notification benefit under Notification No. 12/2012-CE dated 01.03.2012 was available on the same footing. The departmental challenge was therefore not accepted, and the classification and exemption granted by the lower appellate authority were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>