<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 82 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16671</link>
    <description>The Full Bench upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the right to wear jewellery on ceremonial occasions and the interest in the shares fund did not constitute assets under the Wealth-tax Act. It was concluded that subsequent assessments under section 21(1) after direct assessment on the beneficiary were not valid, and assessments under section 21(1) were considered double assessments. The case was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 82 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16671</link>
      <description>The Full Bench upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the right to wear jewellery on ceremonial occasions and the interest in the shares fund did not constitute assets under the Wealth-tax Act. It was concluded that subsequent assessments under section 21(1) after direct assessment on the beneficiary were not valid, and assessments under section 21(1) were considered double assessments. The case was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>