https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374666 The Kerala State Screening Committee alleged profiteering by the Respondent on the supply of "Black Pepper" post-GST implementation. The DGAP's investigation revealed no reduction in tax rates on "Black Pepper" after GST, leading to a finding that the Respondent did not contravene Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, which requires passing on tax benefits to consumers. The application against the Respondent was deemed unsustainable, and the case was closed. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 12:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374666 The Kerala State Screening Committee alleged profiteering by the Respondent on the supply of "Black Pepper" post-GST implementation. The DGAP's investigation revealed no reduction in tax rates on "Black Pepper" after GST, leading to a finding that the Respondent did not contravene Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, which requires passing on tax benefits to consumers. The application against the Respondent was deemed unsustainable, and the case was closed. Case-Laws GST Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374666