<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 281 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374654</link>
    <description>The penalties under Section 271(1)(c) for the assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06 were deleted as the Tribunal found that the charges of &#039;concealment of income&#039; were incorrect and unsustainable. However, the penalty under Section 271AAA for the assessment year 2010-11 was upheld at Rs. 56,120, as the Tribunal did not see a reason to interfere with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:23:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 281 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374654</link>
      <description>The penalties under Section 271(1)(c) for the assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06 were deleted as the Tribunal found that the charges of &#039;concealment of income&#039; were incorrect and unsustainable. However, the penalty under Section 271AAA for the assessment year 2010-11 was upheld at Rs. 56,120, as the Tribunal did not see a reason to interfere with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>