<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 273 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374646</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete various additions made by the Assessing Officer beyond the estimated business income. The Tribunal found these additional additions unsustainable when the books of account were rejected and determined the business income on an estimated basis. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to judicial precedents and principles when making such determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 273 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374646</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete various additions made by the Assessing Officer beyond the estimated business income. The Tribunal found these additional additions unsustainable when the books of account were rejected and determined the business income on an estimated basis. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to judicial precedents and principles when making such determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>