<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 269 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C) due to the lack of clarity in the penalty notice regarding the nature of the alleged default. The judgment emphasized the necessity of precise grounds in penalty notices to uphold principles of natural justice and ensure procedural fairness in penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:22:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 269 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C) due to the lack of clarity in the penalty notice regarding the nature of the alleged default. The judgment emphasized the necessity of precise grounds in penalty notices to uphold principles of natural justice and ensure procedural fairness in penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>