<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 264 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374637</link>
    <description>Imported external or removable hard disc drives were treated as eligible for concessional duty under Serial No. 255 of Notification No. 12/2012-CE because the tariff classification and exemption claim had already been settled in prior proceedings involving the same product. The Tribunal noted that earlier appellate rulings, together with the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the Department&#039;s challenge on merits in the related matter, reinforced that the exemption issue stood concluded against the Revenue&#039;s contention. On that basis, the Commissioner (Appeals) was found correct in allowing the notification benefit and the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 08:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 264 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374637</link>
      <description>Imported external or removable hard disc drives were treated as eligible for concessional duty under Serial No. 255 of Notification No. 12/2012-CE because the tariff classification and exemption claim had already been settled in prior proceedings involving the same product. The Tribunal noted that earlier appellate rulings, together with the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the Department&#039;s challenge on merits in the related matter, reinforced that the exemption issue stood concluded against the Revenue&#039;s contention. On that basis, the Commissioner (Appeals) was found correct in allowing the notification benefit and the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>