<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 259 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374632</link>
    <description>The Member (Judicial) found the Cenvat Credit on Courier service up to 31.03.2008 admissible based on previous judgments. However, for the period post 01.04.2008, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for verification on whether the Courier charges were included in the assessable value. The appeal was disposed of with a direction for further examination on the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on Courier service from 01.04.2008 onwards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:21:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 259 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374632</link>
      <description>The Member (Judicial) found the Cenvat Credit on Courier service up to 31.03.2008 admissible based on previous judgments. However, for the period post 01.04.2008, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for verification on whether the Courier charges were included in the assessable value. The appeal was disposed of with a direction for further examination on the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on Courier service from 01.04.2008 onwards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>