<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 255 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374628</link>
    <description>A unit in Kutch availing area-based exemption under Notification No. 39/01-CE was held entitled to refund or re-credit of Education Cess and Secondary &amp; Higher Education Cess paid through PLA. The issue was governed by the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd., which recognised refundability of these cesses in the relevant exemption context. As that legal position was already settled, no separate reconsideration of the dispute was necessary, and the refund or re-credit claim was maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:21:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 255 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374628</link>
      <description>A unit in Kutch availing area-based exemption under Notification No. 39/01-CE was held entitled to refund or re-credit of Education Cess and Secondary &amp; Higher Education Cess paid through PLA. The issue was governed by the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd., which recognised refundability of these cesses in the relevant exemption context. As that legal position was already settled, no separate reconsideration of the dispute was necessary, and the refund or re-credit claim was maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>