<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 254 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374627</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, overturning the penalties imposed and invalidating the demand raised after an extended period. The Tribunal found no evidence of intentional suppression of facts by the appellants to evade duty payment, leading to the appeal&#039;s success based on limitation grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:21:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 254 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374627</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, overturning the penalties imposed and invalidating the demand raised after an extended period. The Tribunal found no evidence of intentional suppression of facts by the appellants to evade duty payment, leading to the appeal&#039;s success based on limitation grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>