<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 251 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374624</link>
    <description>A writ petition seeking quashment of an assessment order and restraint on further proceedings was disposed of by applying an earlier Division Bench ruling. The parties agreed that the legal question was already covered by the judgment in The Commercial Tax Officer v. S. Najeem. On that basis, the High Court declined fresh adjudication and closed the petition by following the binding precedent, without recording any separate or additional reasoning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 251 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374624</link>
      <description>A writ petition seeking quashment of an assessment order and restraint on further proceedings was disposed of by applying an earlier Division Bench ruling. The parties agreed that the legal question was already covered by the judgment in The Commercial Tax Officer v. S. Najeem. On that basis, the High Court declined fresh adjudication and closed the petition by following the binding precedent, without recording any separate or additional reasoning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>