<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1640 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278478</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of the reassessment proceedings and the taxability of the Rs. 28,00,00,000 received under the arbitration award as &quot;Income from other sources&quot; under section 56(1) of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the principles of natural justice were adhered to and rejected the alternative claim of a family settlement due to insufficient evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1640 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278478</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of the reassessment proceedings and the taxability of the Rs. 28,00,00,000 received under the arbitration award as &quot;Income from other sources&quot; under section 56(1) of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the principles of natural justice were adhered to and rejected the alternative claim of a family settlement due to insufficient evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>