https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374620 The Court partly allowed the petition challenging the validity of seizure orders and seeking provisional release of seized goods. The petitioner, engaged in jewelry manufacturing, faced hardship due to non-release of goods seized during a search under the CGST Act. Relying on relevant provisions, the Court directed the respondents to provisionally release the goods upon the petitioner executing a bond for the total value of goods and providing a bank guarantee of &8377; 50 lakhs, serving the interest of justice. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374620 The Court partly allowed the petition challenging the validity of seizure orders and seeking provisional release of seized goods. The petitioner, engaged in jewelry manufacturing, faced hardship due to non-release of goods seized during a search under the CGST Act. Relying on relevant provisions, the Court directed the respondents to provisionally release the goods upon the petitioner executing a bond for the total value of goods and providing a bank guarantee of &8377; 50 lakhs, serving the interest of justice. Case-Laws GST Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374620