<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 241 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374614</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer in making additions beyond the scope of the revisional order. The Court emphasized the need for authorities to act within specified limits and dismissed the appeals concerning the entrance fees and annual subscription issues due to the failure of the primary issue raised by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 06:15:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 241 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374614</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer in making additions beyond the scope of the revisional order. The Court emphasized the need for authorities to act within specified limits and dismissed the appeals concerning the entrance fees and annual subscription issues due to the failure of the primary issue raised by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>