<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 238 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374611</link>
    <description>The High Court held that section 43D of the Income Tax Act applies to cooperative banks, extending its scope to include them. Interest on Non Performing Assets (NPA) in cooperative banks was deemed non-taxable based on legal precedents and legislative intent. The Court also dismissed the allowance of amortized premium on investments in Government Securities as revenue expenditure. All appeals challenging these issues were rejected by the High Court, relying on real income theory and established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 238 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374611</link>
      <description>The High Court held that section 43D of the Income Tax Act applies to cooperative banks, extending its scope to include them. Interest on Non Performing Assets (NPA) in cooperative banks was deemed non-taxable based on legal precedents and legislative intent. The Court also dismissed the allowance of amortized premium on investments in Government Securities as revenue expenditure. All appeals challenging these issues were rejected by the High Court, relying on real income theory and established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>