<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16655</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the investment allowance under section 32A for plant and machinery used in manufacturing cigarette filter rods. The court determined that cigarette filter rods were distinct from items listed in the Eleventh Schedule, emphasizing their different purposes. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:12:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16655</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the investment allowance under section 32A for plant and machinery used in manufacturing cigarette filter rods. The court determined that cigarette filter rods were distinct from items listed in the Eleventh Schedule, emphasizing their different purposes. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>