<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 226 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the long term capital gain was genuine and qualified for exemption under section 10(38). The decision emphasized the lack of concrete evidence linking the appellants to fraudulent activities, highlighting the importance of thorough scrutiny and specific evidence in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 226 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the long term capital gain was genuine and qualified for exemption under section 10(38). The decision emphasized the lack of concrete evidence linking the appellants to fraudulent activities, highlighting the importance of thorough scrutiny and specific evidence in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>