<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 223 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the payments to UK and Singapore subsidiaries did not constitute &#039;Fees for Technical Services&#039; and were not taxable in India, as they did not provide technical knowledge or skills. The Tribunal emphasized that TDS was not required if the payment was not chargeable to tax in India, in line with the DTAA provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 06:14:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 223 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the payments to UK and Singapore subsidiaries did not constitute &#039;Fees for Technical Services&#039; and were not taxable in India, as they did not provide technical knowledge or skills. The Tribunal emphasized that TDS was not required if the payment was not chargeable to tax in India, in line with the DTAA provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>