<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 218 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374591</link>
    <description>A refund claim filed within the prescribed period cannot be defeated by departmental inaction where the receiving Commissionerate retained it for nearly six months without rejecting it or returning it for want of jurisdiction. The authority that received the claim was expected to promptly inform the claimant to present it before the proper jurisdictional Commissionerate. Rejection of the refund as time-barred was therefore unjustified, and the claim was directed to be considered on merits by the proper Commissionerate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 218 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374591</link>
      <description>A refund claim filed within the prescribed period cannot be defeated by departmental inaction where the receiving Commissionerate retained it for nearly six months without rejecting it or returning it for want of jurisdiction. The authority that received the claim was expected to promptly inform the claimant to present it before the proper jurisdictional Commissionerate. Rejection of the refund as time-barred was therefore unjustified, and the claim was directed to be considered on merits by the proper Commissionerate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>