<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 205 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned orders on limitation and allowing the appeals with consequential reliefs. The judgment emphasized the significance of seeking clarification from authorities and acting in good faith based on such guidance in excise duty compliance matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 06:12:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 205 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned orders on limitation and allowing the appeals with consequential reliefs. The judgment emphasized the significance of seeking clarification from authorities and acting in good faith based on such guidance in excise duty compliance matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>