<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1417 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278465</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to disallow the weighted deduction claimed under Section 35(2AB) for AY 2011-12. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the approval date specified by the competent authority, ruling that post-facto compliance is not allowed. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, affirming that the assessee was not eligible for the deduction due to the approval being effective from 01-04-2011 onwards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1417 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278465</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to disallow the weighted deduction claimed under Section 35(2AB) for AY 2011-12. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the approval date specified by the competent authority, ruling that post-facto compliance is not allowed. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, affirming that the assessee was not eligible for the deduction due to the approval being effective from 01-04-2011 onwards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>