<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16649</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claim of Rs. 60,000 as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1975-76. The Tribunal determined that the expenditure on resurfacing the road within the factory premises did not create a new asset or substantially improve the existing asset, aligning with precedents that customary repairs without creating new assets are revenue expenditures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:00:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16649</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claim of Rs. 60,000 as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1975-76. The Tribunal determined that the expenditure on resurfacing the road within the factory premises did not create a new asset or substantially improve the existing asset, aligning with precedents that customary repairs without creating new assets are revenue expenditures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>