<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 164 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessments for A.Ys. 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 as they were outside the allowable period under section 153C. For A.Ys. 2005-2006 to 2008-2009, the matters were sent back to the A.O. for reevaluation to ensure the seized documents pertained to the relevant years and were not previously recorded. The judgment emphasizes compliance with procedural rules and the accurate documentation of satisfaction notes in assessments related to searches.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 164 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessments for A.Ys. 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 as they were outside the allowable period under section 153C. For A.Ys. 2005-2006 to 2008-2009, the matters were sent back to the A.O. for reevaluation to ensure the seized documents pertained to the relevant years and were not previously recorded. The judgment emphasizes compliance with procedural rules and the accurate documentation of satisfaction notes in assessments related to searches.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>