<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 153 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of another company should not be considered as income. Relying on relevant case laws and a certificate from the other company confirming the nature of the payments, the Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 24,27,721/- made by the Assessing Officer was unjustified. As a result, the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the addition to the income was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 07:04:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 153 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of another company should not be considered as income. Relying on relevant case laws and a certificate from the other company confirming the nature of the payments, the Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 24,27,721/- made by the Assessing Officer was unjustified. As a result, the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the addition to the income was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>