<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 143 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374516</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that coloader charges received by a courier company from other courier agencies are not taxable under Business Auxiliary Services. The appellant successfully argued that co-loader services are not directly provided to customers but are included in the final service charged to customers by courier agencies. Despite the Revenue&#039;s push for taxation to promote business, the Tribunal relied on past cases, including United Business Xpress India Pvt. Ltd., to rule in favor of the appellant. The appeal was allowed, and the previous order seeking to tax the coloader charges was set aside, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 07:03:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 143 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374516</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that coloader charges received by a courier company from other courier agencies are not taxable under Business Auxiliary Services. The appellant successfully argued that co-loader services are not directly provided to customers but are included in the final service charged to customers by courier agencies. Despite the Revenue&#039;s push for taxation to promote business, the Tribunal relied on past cases, including United Business Xpress India Pvt. Ltd., to rule in favor of the appellant. The appeal was allowed, and the previous order seeking to tax the coloader charges was set aside, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>