<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1639 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reopening of assessment under section 147 by the Revenue. It was found that the AO&#039;s action in reopening the assessment based on the same facts was impermissible as it amounted to a change of opinion. The Tribunal emphasized the prohibition against such reopening and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, aligning with past decisions and legal principles, including the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in the Kelvinator case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 06:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1639 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reopening of assessment under section 147 by the Revenue. It was found that the AO&#039;s action in reopening the assessment based on the same facts was impermissible as it amounted to a change of opinion. The Tribunal emphasized the prohibition against such reopening and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, aligning with past decisions and legal principles, including the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in the Kelvinator case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>