<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1247 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278451</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2008-09 and dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2010-11. The decisions were based on the application of Rule 8D for disallowance under section 14A, the non-fulfillment of conditions under section 36 for bad debt write-offs, and the statutory restriction on claiming R&amp;amp;D expenditure under multiple provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 06:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1247 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278451</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2008-09 and dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2010-11. The decisions were based on the application of Rule 8D for disallowance under section 14A, the non-fulfillment of conditions under section 36 for bad debt write-offs, and the statutory restriction on claiming R&amp;amp;D expenditure under multiple provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>