<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 36 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16632</link>
    <description>The court held that the firm did not qualify as an &quot;industrial undertaking&quot; under Section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The activities of purchasing groundnuts and having them crushed by an outside agency were deemed trading activities, not manufacturing or processing. As the firm did not directly engage in manufacturing or processing, it was not eligible for the exemption claimed by the assessees. The decision favored the Department over the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 36 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16632</link>
      <description>The court held that the firm did not qualify as an &quot;industrial undertaking&quot; under Section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The activities of purchasing groundnuts and having them crushed by an outside agency were deemed trading activities, not manufacturing or processing. As the firm did not directly engage in manufacturing or processing, it was not eligible for the exemption claimed by the assessees. The decision favored the Department over the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>