<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1658 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by directing the deletion of additions towards unsecured loans under Section 68 and accepting the net profit as declared for construction projects. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of purchases under Section 40A(3) and the disallowance of interest under Section 40(a)(ia).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 06:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1658 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by directing the deletion of additions towards unsecured loans under Section 68 and accepting the net profit as declared for construction projects. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of purchases under Section 40A(3) and the disallowance of interest under Section 40(a)(ia).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>