https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278442 Advocates who deliberately stormed courtrooms, disrupted proceedings and scandalised the authority of the Delhi High Court were found guilty of gross contempt because their conduct interfered with the administration of justice and undermined court discipline. A belated apology was treated as insufficient to show genuine contrition, so it did not secure complete exoneration. The Court, however, deferred immediate sentencing for one year and warned that any further misconduct would attract punishment. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Feb 2019 14:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278442 Advocates who deliberately stormed courtrooms, disrupted proceedings and scandalised the authority of the Delhi High Court were found guilty of gross contempt because their conduct interfered with the administration of justice and undermined court discipline. A belated apology was treated as insufficient to show genuine contrition, so it did not secure complete exoneration. The Court, however, deferred immediate sentencing for one year and warned that any further misconduct would attract punishment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278442