<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dispute Over Incentive Classification as Commission u/s 194H of Income Tax Act; Questions on Decision&#039;s Validity.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44278</link>
    <description>TDS u/s 194H - How the said incentive has been treated to be as ‘commission’ is not clear, because once assessee has said that the incentive given to his ex employee was in the nature of salary, then simply rejecting the contention without any basis cannot be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 13:48:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 13:48:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dispute Over Incentive Classification as Commission u/s 194H of Income Tax Act; Questions on Decision&#039;s Validity.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44278</link>
      <description>TDS u/s 194H - How the said incentive has been treated to be as ‘commission’ is not clear, because once assessee has said that the incentive given to his ex employee was in the nature of salary, then simply rejecting the contention without any basis cannot be sustained.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 13:48:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>