https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374473 The court affirmed the jurisdiction of the second respondent, an Additional Director General of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, to issue the show cause notice under Sections 111 and 112 of the Customs Act. It held that the second respondent was designated as the proper officer under Section 2(34) of the Customs Act, based on relevant notifications and legal precedents. The court dismissed the writ petition and directed the first respondent to conclude the matter concerning the seized goods within a specified timeline as per the Customs Act. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Feb 2019 09:27:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374473 The court affirmed the jurisdiction of the second respondent, an Additional Director General of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, to issue the show cause notice under Sections 111 and 112 of the Customs Act. It held that the second respondent was designated as the proper officer under Section 2(34) of the Customs Act, based on relevant notifications and legal precedents. The court dismissed the writ petition and directed the first respondent to conclude the matter concerning the seized goods within a specified timeline as per the Customs Act. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374473