<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 99 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374472</link>
    <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty was examined under Notification No. 102/2007-Customs, 14.09.2007, where the imported goods were exempt from the relevant VAT or sales tax law and proof of VAT or CST payment was not produced. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions holding that this refund condition could not be used to deny relief in such facts. The lower authority&#039;s rejection of the refund claim was therefore found unsustainable, and refund was held admissible to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 09:27:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 99 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374472</link>
      <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty was examined under Notification No. 102/2007-Customs, 14.09.2007, where the imported goods were exempt from the relevant VAT or sales tax law and proof of VAT or CST payment was not produced. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions holding that this refund condition could not be used to deny relief in such facts. The lower authority&#039;s rejection of the refund claim was therefore found unsustainable, and refund was held admissible to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>