<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 94 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374467</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994, which includes expenses in the &#039;gross amount&#039; for service tax valuation. It emphasized the distinction between expenses like salaries and statutory payments in determining taxable service, ultimately dismissing the Writ Appeals challenging the constitutional validity of the statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 09:26:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 94 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374467</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994, which includes expenses in the &#039;gross amount&#039; for service tax valuation. It emphasized the distinction between expenses like salaries and statutory payments in determining taxable service, ultimately dismissing the Writ Appeals challenging the constitutional validity of the statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>